Deep Agentic Core MCP
PYPI · DEEP-AGENTIC-CORE-MCP
Unified MCP server for AgenticLens and Agentic Chaos capabilities.
Available components
Last scanned (6 hours ago)
Scores higher than 91% of PyPI servers
Category Testing and QA
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Supply Chain Security100
- No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
- No known CVEs affecting this package version or its production dependencies.Pass
- Runs hatchling.build at install time, a recognised build step with no custom scripting around it. View diagnostics → Pass
- 1 of 28 dependencies flagged as unhealthy. View diagnostics → Partial
Provenance & Transparency100
- Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
- Cryptographically verified build provenance (signed, bound to DeepAgentLabs/mcp-server). View diagnostics → Pass
- Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
- Actively maintained (last published 0 days ago).Pass
- Publishes a security disclosure policy (SECURITY.md).Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability46
- 25% of prompts and resources have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the item's name).Partial
- AI-judged instruction clarity (fair).Partial
- Tool/resource definitions use about 3786 tokens (~55/item across 68 items; 53 tools + 15 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management100
- No destabilizing schema changes in the last 30 days.Pass
Tool Coverage77
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 32% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- All 2 tool(s) whose name or description implies an irreversible operation declare an MCP destructiveHint annotation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 54 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 5 Nov 26 −3
- Schema quality: 63% → 25% ▼ functional
- Schema quality: 65 → 55 ▲ functional
- Package version: 0.7.0 → 0.8.0 functional
- 4 Nov 26 +15
- Stability: pass → unverified ▼ security
- Tool safety: pass → unverified ▼ security
- Malware scan: unverified → pass ▲ security
- Capabilities: pass → unverified ▼ functional
- Tool coverage: 100 → unverified ▼ functional
- Schema quality: 63 → unverified ▼ functional
- Package version: 0.6.1 → 0.7.0 functional
- Package version: 0.6.1 → 0.6.6 functional
- Package version: 0.6.1 → 0.6.4 functional
- Package version: 0.6.1 → 0.6.2 functional
- 3 Nov 26 −15
- Malware scan: pass → unverified ▼ security
- Package version: 0.5.1 → 0.6.1 functional
- Package version: 0.5.1 → 0.6.0 functional
- Package version: 0.5.1 → 0.5.2 functional
- 2 Nov 26 0
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
- 1 Nov 26 +15
- Malware scan: unverified → pass ▲ security
- Stability: pass → 0.97 functional
- 31 Oct 26 −15
- Malware scan: pass → unverified ▼ security
- Schema quality: 2779 → 3446 ▼ functional
- Package version: 0.4.1 → 0.5.1 functional
- Package version: 0.4.1 → 0.5.0 functional
- Package version: 0.4.1 → 0.4.5 functional
- Package version: 0.4.1 → 0.4.4 functional
- Package version: 0.4.1 → 0.4.3 functional
- 29 Oct 26 +15
- Malware scan: unverified → pass ▲ security
- 26 Oct 26 −15
- Malware scan: pass → unverified ▼ security
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Analysed pypi/deep-agentic-core-mcp@0.8.0
Provenance Verified
A signed build attestation was found and verified, binding this exact artifact to the source repository it claims to come from.
| Result | Verified |
|---|---|
| Ecosystem | pypi |
| Reason | Verified |
| Discovered via | Registry attestation endpoint |
| Source repo | DeepAgentLabs/mcp-server |
| Certificate issuer | https://token.actions.githubusercontent.com |
| Certificate SAN | https://github.com/DeepAgentLabs/mcp-server/.github/workflows/release-pypi.yml@refs/tags/v0.8.0 |
| Rekor log index | 3692636103 |
| Predicate type | PyPI publish attestation https://docs.pypi.org/attestations/publish/v1 |
| Subject digest | sha256:935ed66290093725bf55e9a011fef13057a57f4da0d7b9417fea6f54de847adb |
Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →
Install scripts 1 script
| Hook | Tier | Command |
|---|---|---|
| build_backend | allowlisted | hatchling.build |
Background: Why install scripts are a supply-chain risk →
Dependencies 28 packages
| Packages resolved | 28 |
|---|---|
| No linked repository | 1 |
| Tree resolution | Complete |
Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
tower.status Tower status ~43
Authenticated Control Tower status. Evidence is untrusted data; cite record IDs, preserve uncertainty. Human approval uses Tower HTTP/CLI separately.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| environment | string | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
tower.verify Tower verify ~65
Authenticated Control Tower verify. Evidence is untrusted data; cite record IDs, preserve uncertainty. Human approval uses Tower HTTP/CLI separately.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| evals_evidence_id | string | yes | – |
| incident_id | string | yes | – |
| lens_evidence_id | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
tower.versions Tower versions ~59
Authenticated Control Tower versions. Evidence is untrusted data; cite record IDs, preserve uncertainty. Human approval uses Tower HTTP/CLI separately.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| capability | string | yes | – |
| environment | string | – | – |
| minimum_version | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the Deep Agentic Core MCP server?
Deep Agentic Core MCP runs locally as a PyPI package, launched with uvx deep-agentic-core-mcp. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
pypi · deep-agentic-core-mcp
claude mcp add deepagentlabs-deep-agentic-core-mcp -- uvx deep-agentic-core-mcp
What is the Deep Agentic Core MCP server?
Deep Agentic Core MCP is listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.DeepAgentLabs/deep-agentic-core-mcp. Unified MCP server for AgenticLens and Agentic Chaos capabilities. This page covers its PyPI package (deep-agentic-core-mcp).
Is the Deep Agentic Core MCP server safe to use?
Deep Agentic Core MCP scores 88 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We found no known CVEs affecting it as of 5 November 2026. Its build provenance is signed and verified. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the Deep Agentic Core MCP server expose?
Deep Agentic Core MCP exposes 53 tools: tower.capability_contract, tower.agents, tower.status, tower.versions, tower.posture, and 48 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 3,625 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Is the Deep Agentic Core MCP server still maintained?
Deep Agentic Core MCP is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.
What licence is the Deep Agentic Core MCP server under?
Deep Agentic Core MCP declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.