# Vitkilabs Anvil (mcpb · vitkilabs-anvil-mcp-0.0.6.mcpb)

Encrypted, local memory for Claude, Codex/ChatGPT and Copilot. Needs the free Vitkilabs Anvil app.

- Trust score: 40/100 (low)
- Change this week: +3
- Registry status: active
- Liveness: live
- Owner verified: no
- Last scored: 2026-11-05

## Components

- mcpb · `vitkilabs-anvil-mcp-0.0.6.mcpb`: 40/100 (this document), [markdown](https://verifymcp.io/servers/com-vitkilabs-vitkilabs-anvil/vitkilabs-anvil-mcp-2.md), [page](https://verifymcp.io/servers/com-vitkilabs-vitkilabs-anvil/vitkilabs-anvil-mcp-2)

## Channel facts

- Registry: `mcpb`
- Package: `https://github.com/Vitkilabs/vitkilabs-anvil/releases/download/v0.0.5/vitkilabs-anvil-mcp-0.0.6.mcpb`
- Version: `0.0.6`
- Transport: `stdio`
- SHA-256: `1fe4ac658509f3257823def547d1b27ecf3a42d855a7ccc32a49c4ae11f35f83`

## Trust breakdown

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. Scores are 0–100 per category. Scoring method: https://verifymcp.io/docs/scoring (what has changed: https://verifymcp.io/docs/scoring/changelog)

Scored 2026-11-05.

- **Supply Chain Security**: 0/100
  - No malware scan is available for this kind of package: the supply-chain vendors we use do not cover it. This is a permanent gap in our coverage, not a finding about the package.
  - Known CVEs could not be checked: we found no dependency list to check in this bundle: either it runs a compiled binary, whose bundled manifests we do not read, or none of the package.json, requirements.txt, pyproject.toml or uv.lock files it ships for its runtime declares a dependency we can read (a requirements.txt that only points at a setup.py project, a local path, or a nested requirements file we cannot follow counts as none).
  - Install-script risk not yet assessed.
  - Dependency health could not be checked: we found no dependency list to check in this bundle: either it runs a compiled binary, whose bundled manifests we do not read, or none of the package.json, requirements.txt, pyproject.toml or uv.lock files it ships for its runtime declares a dependency we can read (a requirements.txt that only points at a setup.py project, a local path, or a nested requirements file we cannot follow counts as none).
- **Provenance & Transparency**: 6/100
  - Repository check failed: no source repository is declared.
  - Provenance check failed: no build-provenance attestation is published.
  - License check failed: the license (Proprietary) isn't a recognized OSI-approved license.
  - Actively maintained (last published 20 days ago).
  - Disclosure check failed: no security disclosure policy was found in the source repository.
- **Schema Quality & AI Usability**: 66/100
  - AI-judged instruction clarity (good).
  - Tool/resource definitions use about 159 tokens (~159/item across 1 items; 1 tools + 0 resources), lean.
  - Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples.
- **Stability & Change Management**: 67/100
  - Stability observed for 20 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.
- **Tool Coverage**: 100/100
  - 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).
- **Tool Safety**: 100/100
  - No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.
  - We read all 1 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.
  - An AI judge read all 2 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.
- **Capabilities**: 100/100
  - Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.

**Unverified: 1 category.** A category scored 0 because we could not verify it: a data source with nothing on this package, evidence we could not reach, or a check we could not run. We only credit what we can confirm.

## Install

### How do I install the Vitkilabs Anvil MCP server?

Vitkilabs Anvil ships as an MCPB bundle, a single file you download and open in an MCP host that supports MCPB bundles, such as Claude Desktop. The host reads the launch command from the bundle's own manifest, so there is no command to copy. Before opening it, check the file's SHA-256 matches the one the MCP registry declares for it, 1fe4ac658509f3257823def547d1b27ecf3a42d855a7ccc32a49c4ae11f35f83; the commands to do that are on this page. If it does not match, do not open it.

- Download bundle: `https://github.com/Vitkilabs/vitkilabs-anvil/releases/download/v0.0.5/vitkilabs-anvil-mcp-0.0.6.mcpb`
- SHA-256: `1fe4ac658509f3257823def547d1b27ecf3a42d855a7ccc32a49c4ae11f35f83`

### Verify on macOS / Linux

```bash
echo "1fe4ac658509f3257823def547d1b27ecf3a42d855a7ccc32a49c4ae11f35f83  vitkilabs-anvil-mcp-0.0.6.mcpb" | shasum -a 256 -c
```

### Verify on Windows (PowerShell)

```powershell
(Get-FileHash -Algorithm SHA256 .\vitkilabs-anvil-mcp-0.0.6.mcpb).Hash -eq "1fe4ac658509f3257823def547d1b27ecf3a42d855a7ccc32a49c4ae11f35f83"
```

## Changelog

Every change recorded for this component, newest first. Days that predate change tracking, or that we cannot explain, say so: "we were watching and nothing happened" and "we were not watching" are different claims.

### 2026-11-04 (score 40, +1)

No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 60 to 63. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 18 days of observed history at the previous scan, 19 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

### 2026-11-01 (score 39, +2)

- [functional improvement] Maintenance: unverified → pass

### 2026-10-31 (score 37, +1)

- [security regression] Provenance: unverified → fail
- [functional regression] Security disclosure: unverified → fail

### 2026-10-30 (score 36, −1)

- [security regression] Provenance: fail → unverified
- [functional regression] Maintenance: pass → unverified
- [functional regression] Security disclosure: fail → unverified

### 2026-10-28 (score 37, +1)

No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 37 to 40. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 11 days of observed history at the previous scan, 12 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

### 2026-10-26 (score 36, +1)

No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 30 to 33. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 9 days of observed history at the previous scan, 10 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

### 2026-10-24 (score 35, +4)

- [functional improvement] Stability: unverified → 0.27

### 2026-10-16 (score 31)

First indexed and scored.

## MCP tools (1)

### `anvil_install_help` (~38 tokens)

Vitkilabs Anvil (encrypted, local memory for your assistants) is not installed on this computer. Call this for the install steps.

## Diagnostics

Captured diagnostic sections: Provenance. The full working is on the page: https://verifymcp.io/servers/com-vitkilabs-vitkilabs-anvil/vitkilabs-anvil-mcp-2#diagnostics

## Score history

- 2026-11-05: 40
- 2026-11-04: 40
- 2026-11-03: 39
- 2026-11-02: 39
- 2026-11-01: 39
- 2026-10-31: 37
- 2026-10-30: 36
- 2026-10-29: 37
- 2026-10-28: 37
- 2026-10-27: 36
- 2026-10-26: 36
- 2026-10-25: 35
- 2026-10-24: 35
- 2026-10-23: 31
- 2026-10-22: 31
- 2026-10-21: 31
- 2026-10-20: 31
- 2026-10-19: 31
- 2026-10-18: 31
- 2026-10-17: 31
- 2026-10-16: 31

## Common questions

### What is the Vitkilabs Anvil MCP server?

Vitkilabs Anvil is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.vitkilabs/vitkilabs-anvil. Encrypted, local memory for Claude, Codex/ChatGPT and Copilot. Needs the free Vitkilabs Anvil app. This page covers its MCPB bundle (https://github.com/Vitkilabs/vitkilabs-anvil/releases/download/v0.0.5/vitkilabs-anvil-mcp-0.0.6.mcpb).

### Is the Vitkilabs Anvil MCP server safe to use?

Vitkilabs Anvil scores 40 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

### What tools does the Vitkilabs Anvil MCP server expose?

Vitkilabs Anvil exposes 1 tool: anvil_install_help. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 38 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

### What licence is the Vitkilabs Anvil MCP server under?

Vitkilabs Anvil declares the Proprietary licence, which is not on the OSI-approved list. Read the terms before using it at work, and note this covers the source only, not the cost of any service it calls.

### What did VerifyMCP test on the Vitkilabs Anvil MCP server?

VerifyMCP ran 12 checks on Vitkilabs Anvil, covering Source repository, Provenance, License, Maintenance and 8 more. 4 items could not be completed, a gap on our side rather than a finding about Vitkilabs Anvil: Malware scan, Known CVEs, Install scripts and Dependency health. One category scores 0 for that reason, because we only credit what we can confirm. Endpoint Security and Transport & Reachability do not apply to an MCPB bundle, so they were not tested. The score does not measure everything, and the scoring documentation lists what it leaves out.

## Links

- Website: https://vitkilabs.com/anvil
- Changelog RSS feed: https://verifymcp.io/servers/com-vitkilabs-vitkilabs-anvil/vitkilabs-anvil-mcp-2.xml
- Changelog JSON feed: https://verifymcp.io/servers/com-vitkilabs-vitkilabs-anvil/vitkilabs-anvil-mcp-2/changelog.json
- Trust report (JSON): https://verifymcp.io/servers/com-vitkilabs-vitkilabs-anvil/vitkilabs-anvil-mcp-2.json
- HTML version of this page: https://verifymcp.io/servers/com-vitkilabs-vitkilabs-anvil/vitkilabs-anvil-mcp-2