Onvexia — Crypto Fundamentals, Sentiment & Onchain Tracking
REMOTE · ONVEXIA.COM · SCANNED SEP 20
Crypto fundamental analysis, sentiment and whale tracking for traders and AI agents.
Available components
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security80
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Every tool declares its destructiveHint and none is destructive, so open access doesn't expose one. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability74
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Tool/resource definitions use about 5868 tokens (~88/item across 66 items; 66 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management13
- Stability observed for 4 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage67
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 0% of tool parameters carry a description.Fail
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 66 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 67 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
How do I install the Onvexia — Crypto Fundamentals, Sentiment & Onchain Tracking MCP server?
Onvexia — Crypto Fundamentals, Sentiment & Onchain Tracking is a hosted endpoint at https://onvexia.com/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · onvexia.com
claude mcp add --transport http com-onvexia-onvexia 'https://onvexia.com/mcp'
{
"mcpServers": {
"com-onvexia-onvexia": {
"url": "https://onvexia.com/mcp"
}
}
} {
"servers": {
"com-onvexia-onvexia": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://onvexia.com/mcp"
}
}
} [mcp_servers.com-onvexia-onvexia] url = "https://onvexia.com/mcp"
{
"$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
"mcp": {
"com-onvexia-onvexia": {
"type": "remote",
"url": "https://onvexia.com/mcp",
"enabled": true
}
}
} openclaw mcp add com-onvexia-onvexia --url 'https://onvexia.com/mcp' --transport streamable-http
mcp_servers:
com-onvexia-onvexia:
url: "https://onvexia.com/mcp" {
"McpServers": {
"com-onvexia-onvexia": {
"Transport": "http",
"Url": "https://onvexia.com/mcp"
}
}
} assistant mcp add com-onvexia-onvexia -t streamable-http -u 'https://onvexia.com/mcp'
{
"mcpServers": {
"com-onvexia-onvexia": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://onvexia.com/mcp"
}
}
} The mcpServers block is a cross-client convention. Remote transports vary, so check your client's docs.
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 20 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 10 to 13. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 3 days of observed history at the previous scan, 4 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 18 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 3 to 7. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 1 days of observed history at the previous scan, 2 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 17 Sept 26 0
- Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
- 16 Sept 26 71
First indexed and scored.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 20 Sept 2026 · Probed https://onvexia.com/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=onvexia.com | CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US | 28 Aug 2026 | 26 Nov 2026 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA256 | cf6c8888d78d5f141384ab2effcf4603 |
| SANs: onvexia.com, *.onvexia.com | ||||||
| CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) | CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US | 13 Dec 2023 | 20 Feb 2029 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3 |
| CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) | CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE | 15 Nov 2023 | 28 Jan 2028 | ECDSA 384 | SHA256-RSA | 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of onvexia.com. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| com. | present | 19718 | 13 | Verified |
| onvexia.com. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| strict-transport-security | max-age=15552000; includeSubDomains |
| content-security-policy | default-src 'self'; img-src 'self' data: https://static.alchemyapi.io https://coin-images.coingecko.com https://assets.coingecko.com; connect-src 'self' https://xhhltbldmmksbjiefuay.supabase.co wss://xhhltbldmmksbjiefuay.supabase.co; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' |
| x-content-type-options | nosniff |
| x-frame-options | SAMEORIGIN |
| referrer-policy | strict-origin-when-cross-origin |
| permissions-policy | accelerometer=(), camera=(), geolocation=(), gyroscope=(), magnetometer=(), microphone=(), payment=(), usb=() |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://onvexia.com/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://onvexia.com/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 301 | https://onvexia.com/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
get_top_galaxy_scores Scores · Top by Galaxy Score ~90
The assets with the strongest Galaxy Score right now. Galaxy Score is 0-100 and composite: social volume, engagement, sentiment and market health folded together. A high score is a statement about ATTENTION AND HEALTH, not about valuation — it does not mean an asset is cheap. Call get_asset_scores for the breakdown.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | integer | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_topic_rank Social · Topic rank ~99
Rank what the market is TALKING ABOUT — themes and narratives, not assets. Ranked by mentions weighted by engagement over the window, so a topic posted about loudly by few accounts does not outrank one discussed widely. Use get_trending_assets for tickers; this is the layer above, where "restaking" and "AI agents" live.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| hours | integer | – | – |
| limit | integer | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_trending_assets Social · Trending assets ~34
Assets trending now by social activity, with the hype score that separates a real move from a burst of noise.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_trending_stories Narrative · Trending stories ~80
Current narratives, each an LLM summary of a CLUSTER of posts rather than a single document. Read author_count before quoting one: a high post_count with a low author_count is one person repeating themselves, not a narrative. These are machine summaries, not edited articles.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | integer | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_whale_transactions On-chain · Whale transactions ~110
Recent large on-chain transfers, optionally filtered to one asset. "Whale" is a SIZE threshold, not an identity. A large transfer is very often an exchange moving its own funds between wallets, which is not a market action at all — counterparty labels are included where we hold them, and a null label means WE HAVE NO LABEL, never that the counterparty is unknown or safe.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | integer | – | – |
| symbol | – | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_wrapper_basis Market · Wrapper basis ~162
Cross-wrapper spread for tokenized equities: one real company, every issuer that tokenizes it, and how far apart they trade. SpaceX trades under five wrappers and they do not agree. Spreads run roughly 0.1-0.9 percent between programs referencing the same share. This is a CROSS-WRAPPER comparison, deliberately not a comparison against the underlying stock — that needs a licensed equity feed and no free commercially-usable one exists. A spread is NOT free money. Each issuer carries its own credit, redemption terms and transfer restrictions, and the cheapest wrapper is often cheapest for a reason. Do not present it as an arbitrage.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | integer | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
list_labelled_addresses On-chain · Labelled addresses ~72
Browse labelled addresses, filtered by chain, entity (e.g. Binance) or category (exchange | bridge | dex | mev | staking | mining | sanctioned).
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| category | string | – | – |
| chain | string | – | – |
| entity | string | – | – |
| limit | integer | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
list_metrics Metrics · Catalogue ~111
List every metric Onvexia knows, with its parity and caveats. parity=exact means we compute it the way Santiment does; approximate means same concept but different coverage or method (read the caveat before relying on the number); unavailable means we do NOT serve it yet. Unavailable metrics are listed on purpose — check here before asserting that Onvexia can answer a question.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| available_only | boolean | – | – |
| category | string | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
list_nl_screens Screener · Saved natural-language screens ~59
Previously compiled natural-language screens: the English somebody wrote and the filter it compiled to, INCLUDING refusals. Useful as worked examples of the screener's filter grammar before you write one.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | integer | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
list_research_reports Research · Available reports ~74
List the assets that currently have a generated research report available. Returns the index, not the reports — call get_research_report with a symbol for the body. An asset missing from this list has not been written up; that is a statement about our coverage, not about the asset.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
lookup_address On-chain · Address lookup ~81
Identify a blockchain address — exchange, bridge, DEX, MEV bot, mining pool, or OFAC-sanctioned — with the source and confidence of each label. IMPORTANT: `known: false` means no label is held. It does NOT mean the address is clean or unflagged.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| address | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
resolve_ticker Assets · Resolve ambiguous ticker ~94
Does a bare ticker actually mean the crypto asset? verdict 'crypto' means mentions are about the asset; 'equity'/'other' means the bare word is dominated by something else (TIA is Spanish 'tia'; GRT collides with 'graph'). A 404 is NOT a clean bill of health — it means nobody has adjudicated that ticker yet.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| ticker | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
run_sql SQL · Run read-only query ~58
Run a read-only SELECT against the platform's data. One statement, 15s timeout, 10,000-row cap; truncation is always reported. Call get_sql_schema first for the queryable relations.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| query | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
screen_assets Screener · Run screen ~135
Filter the whole asset universe server-side and return the matches. `filter` is comma-separated `field:op:value` terms, e.g. "market_cap:gt:1000000000,funding_rate:lt:0" — assets over $1B whose funding rate is negative. Ops: gt, gte, lt, lte, eq, ne. Call screener_fields() first to see what fields exist and their ranges; guessing a field name gets the whole query rejected.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| filter | string | – | – |
| limit | integer | – | – |
| sort | string | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
screener_fields Screener · Available fields ~35
Every field the screener accepts, with type and description. Call this before building a filter rather than guessing field names.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
search_assets Assets · Search ~59
Search the whole asset universe (~1,900 assets) by symbol or name. Use this to resolve a user's loose reference into a real symbol before calling the other tools.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | integer | – | – |
| query | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
What is the Onvexia — Crypto Fundamentals, Sentiment & Onchain Tracking MCP server?
Onvexia — Crypto Fundamentals, Sentiment & Onchain Tracking is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.onvexia/onvexia. Crypto fundamental analysis, sentiment and whale tracking for traders and AI agents. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://onvexia.com/mcp).
Is the Onvexia — Crypto Fundamentals, Sentiment & Onchain Tracking MCP server safe to use?
Onvexia — Crypto Fundamentals, Sentiment & Onchain Tracking scores 73 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the Onvexia — Crypto Fundamentals, Sentiment & Onchain Tracking MCP server expose?
Onvexia — Crypto Fundamentals, Sentiment & Onchain Tracking exposes 66 tools: get_asset, get_asset_scores, get_asset_fundamentals, get_asset_technicals, get_top_galaxy_scores, and 61 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 5,644 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the Onvexia — Crypto Fundamentals, Sentiment & Onchain Tracking MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to Onvexia — Crypto Fundamentals, Sentiment & Onchain Tracking without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the Onvexia — Crypto Fundamentals, Sentiment & Onchain Tracking MCP server still maintained?
Onvexia — Crypto Fundamentals, Sentiment & Onchain Tracking is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 20 September 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.