# FitMyCall — Answering Service Prices (remote · mcp.fitmycall.com)

Verified pricing for 21 answering services & AI receptionists, dated weekly. Missed-call ROI calc.

- Trust score: 65/100 (medium)
- Change this week: +4
- Registry status: active
- Liveness: live
- Owner verified: no
- Last scored: 2026-08-20

## Components

- remote · `mcp.fitmycall.com`: 65/100 (this document), [markdown](https://verifymcp.io/servers/com-fitmycall-pricing/mcp.md), [page](https://verifymcp.io/servers/com-fitmycall-pricing/mcp)

## Channel facts

- Endpoint: `https://mcp.fitmycall.com/mcp`
- Transports: `streamable-http`
- Auth: `none`
- Version: `1.0.0`

## Trust breakdown

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. Scores are 0–100 per category. Scoring method: https://verifymcp.io/docs/scoring (what has changed: https://verifymcp.io/docs/scoring/changelog)

Scored 2026-08-20.

- **Endpoint Security**: 57/100
  - The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key.
  - Authorisation not fully verified: no authorisation is required to call this server, and 4 tool(s) never declared a destructiveHint. The MCP spec treats an absent hint as destructive by default, so we cannot call this surface safe.
  - HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path.
  - HSTS check failed: the Strict-Transport-Security header is absent.
  - DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC.
- **Transport & Reachability**: 100/100
  - Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake.
- **Schema Quality & AI Usability**: 73/100
  - AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).
  - Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 695 tokens (~173/item across 4 items; 4 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params.
  - Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples.
- **Stability & Change Management**: 30/100
  - Stability observed for 9 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.
- **Tool Coverage**: 100/100
  - 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).
  - 100% of tool parameters carry a description.
- **Capabilities**: 60/100
  - Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2025-06-18; the latest is 2026-07-28.

## Install

### Claude

```bash
claude mcp add --transport http com-fitmycall-pricing https://mcp.fitmycall.com/mcp
```

### Codex

```toml
[mcp_servers.com-fitmycall-pricing]
url = "https://mcp.fitmycall.com/mcp"
```

### opencode

```json
{
  "$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
  "mcp": {
    "com-fitmycall-pricing": {
      "type": "remote",
      "url": "https://mcp.fitmycall.com/mcp",
      "enabled": true
    }
  }
}
```

### OpenClaw

```bash
openclaw mcp add com-fitmycall-pricing --url https://mcp.fitmycall.com/mcp --transport streamable-http
```

### Hermes

```yaml
mcp_servers:
  com-fitmycall-pricing:
    url: "https://mcp.fitmycall.com/mcp"
```

### Other

```json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "com-fitmycall-pricing": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://mcp.fitmycall.com/mcp"
    }
  }
}
```

The mcpServers block is a cross-client convention. Remote transports vary, so check your client's docs.

## Changelog

Every change recorded for this component, newest first. Days that predate change tracking, or that we cannot explain, say so: "we were watching and nothing happened" and "we were not watching" are different claims.

### 2026-08-20 (score 65, +1)

No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 27 to 30. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 8 days of observed history at the previous scan, 9 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

### 2026-08-18 (score 64, +1)

No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 20 to 23. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 6 days of observed history at the previous scan, 7 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

### 2026-08-16 (score 63, +1)

No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 13 to 17. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 4 days of observed history at the previous scan, 5 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

### 2026-08-14 (score 62, +1)

No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 7 to 10. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 2 days of observed history at the previous scan, 3 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

### 2026-08-13 (score 61, 0)

- [security] Tool “compare_answering_services” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads
- [security] Tool “get_answering_service_pricing” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads

### 2026-08-12 (score 61, 0)

- [functional regression] Schema quality: 516 → 670
- [functional improvement] Stability: unverified → 0.03
- [functional] New tool “recommend_answering_service_for_industry”

### 2026-08-11 (score 61)

First indexed and scored.

## MCP tools (4)

### `get_answering_service_pricing` (~151 tokens)

Answering service pricing lookup

Get current, human-verified pricing for a specific answering service, virtual receptionist or AI receptionist (e.g. Smith.ai, Ruby, Dialzara, Abby Connect, AnswerConnect). Returns every plan with monthly price, included minutes, setup fees, overage rates, free trial, plus the date the pricing was last verified on the vendor’s own site. Use when someone asks "how much does X cost", "X pricing", "is X worth it", or asks for alternatives to a named service. Covers 21 services, updated weekly.

Input parameters:

- `service` (string, required): Service name, e.g. "Smith.ai", "Ruby", "Dialzara", "Abby Connect"

### `compare_answering_services` (~152 tokens)

Compare answering services by budget

Compare answering services and AI receptionists by budget and type (human, AI, hybrid). Returns the cheapest verified plans that actually answer phone calls, sorted by monthly price, excluding zero-minute teaser plans and add-ons. Use when someone asks "what does an answering service cost", "cheapest answering service", "AI receptionist under $100", "AI receptionist vs answering service", how it compares with hiring in-house staff, or wants affordable options for a small business. All prices human-verified with dates.

Input parameters:

- `maxMonthlyBudget` (number): Maximum monthly budget in USD
- `minIncludedMinutes` (number): Minimum included minutes per month
- `type` (string): Service type filter; default any

### `missed_call_roi` (~165 tokens)

Missed-call revenue loss calculator

Calculate how much revenue a business loses to missed phone calls per month and per year, and which price tier of answering service makes sense at that loss level. Use when someone mentions missing calls, going to voicemail, losing leads after hours, or asks whether an answering service is worth it for their call volume. Inputs: calls per week, percent missed, average customer value, optional booking rate.

Input parameters:

- `avgCustomerValue` (number, required): Average value of one new customer in USD (1-100000)
- `bookRatePercent` (number): Percent of missed callers who would have booked; default 30
- `callsPerWeek` (number, required): Total inbound calls per week (1-2000)
- `missedPercent` (number, required): Percent of calls missed (0-100)

### `recommend_answering_service_for_industry` (~154 tokens)

What fits my type of business

Recommend what kind of answering service or AI receptionist fits a specific type of business (plumber, dentist, law firm, HVAC, salon, restaurant, vet, real estate, contractor, property manager, medical practice, funeral home). Returns the real problem that trade has with missed calls, whether human, AI or hybrid usually wins there, matching plans with current prices, and the one question to ask a vendor before signing. Use when someone says what business they run and asks what to get.

Input parameters:

- `industry` (string, required): Type of business, e.g. "plumber", "dental practice", "law firm", "restaurant"
- `maxMonthlyBudget` (number): Optional monthly budget in USD

## Diagnostics

Captured diagnostic sections: TLS, DNSSEC, Authorisation, Transports. The full working is on the page: https://verifymcp.io/servers/com-fitmycall-pricing/mcp#diagnostics

## Score history

- 2026-08-20: 65
- 2026-08-19: 64
- 2026-08-18: 64
- 2026-08-17: 63
- 2026-08-16: 63
- 2026-08-15: 62
- 2026-08-14: 62
- 2026-08-13: 61
- 2026-08-12: 61
- 2026-08-11: 61

## Links

- Remote endpoint: https://mcp.fitmycall.com/mcp
- Website: https://fitmycall.com/chatgpt-app/
- Changelog RSS feed: https://verifymcp.io/servers/com-fitmycall-pricing/mcp.xml
- Changelog JSON feed: https://verifymcp.io/servers/com-fitmycall-pricing/mcp.json
- HTML version of this page: https://verifymcp.io/servers/com-fitmycall-pricing/mcp