Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

Citiview Agent Market

REMOTE · MCP.CITIVIEWGROUP.COM

186 pay-per-call tools: search, LLMs, UK KYB, FRED, Census, maps, crypto. x402 USDC.

67 Trust /100

Last scanned (7 hours ago)

Scores higher than 57% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 17 Oct 2026.

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security63
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability76
  • 100% of prompts and resources have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the item's name).Pass
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 25741 tokens (~121/item across 212 items; 211 tools + 1 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management10
  • Stability observed for 3 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage85
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 54% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 211 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 213 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 16 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 3 to 7. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 1 days of observed history at the previous scan, 2 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 15 Oct 26 +1
    • Judged manipulation: unverified → pass ▲ security
    • The server rewrote its instructions, which are the text every model session reads security
    • Tool “address_verify” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “audio_transcriptions” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “chart” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “chat_completions” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “chunk” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “citecheck” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “coder_chat_completions” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “crypto_price” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “defi_yields” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “document” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “domain” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “economy” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “email_verify” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “embed” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “embeddings” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “energy” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “errorfix” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “extract” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “fred_search” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “fred_series” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “fun” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “fx” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “gemma_chat_completions” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “geocode” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “glm_chat_completions” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “gpt_oss_20b_chat_completions” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “gpt_oss_chat_completions” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “grade” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “image_describe” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “image_generate” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “inflation_breakdown” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “inflation_calculator” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “isochrone” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “labor” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “labor_state” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “large_chat_completions” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “llama4_chat_completions” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “llm_large” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “macro_us” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “map_static” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “markdown” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “memory” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “mistral_chat_completions” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “moderate” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “moderations” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “nemotron_chat_completions” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “news” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “papers” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “pdf” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “predictions” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “qr” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “qwen_chat_completions” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “rates” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “recession” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “rerank” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “route” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “route_matrix” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “rpc” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “sanctions” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “scrape” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “screenshot” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “search” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “second_opinion” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “sentiment” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “serp” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “solana_priority_fee” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “speak” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “summarize” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “token_report” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “transcribe” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “translate” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “wages” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “wallet” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “weather” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Schema quality: 108 → 121 ▼ functional
    • Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
    • New tool “browser_act” functional
    • New tool “browser_start” functional
    • New tool “code_run” functional
    • New tool “crawl” functional
    • New tool “db” functional
    • New tool “deepseek_chat_completions” functional
    • New tool “deepseek_pro_chat_completions” functional
    • New tool “docs_ask” functional
    • New tool “firewall” functional
    • New tool “glm5_chat_completions” functional
    • New tool “glm5_flash_chat_completions” functional
    • New tool “granite_chat_completions” functional
    • New tool “image_inpaint” functional
    • New tool “image_pro” functional
    • New tool “kimi_chat_completions” functional
    • New tool “kimi_code_chat_completions” functional
    • New tool “kya” functional
    • New tool “qwen3_8_chat_completions” functional
    • New tool “qwq_chat_completions” functional
    • New tool “r1_chat_completions” functional
    • New tool “sea_lion_chat_completions” functional
    • New tool “speak_pro” functional
    • New tool “storage” functional
    • New tool “transcribe_pro” functional
    • New tool “vectors” functional
  • 14 Oct 26 65

    First indexed and scored.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 17 Oct 2026 · Probed https://mcp.citiviewgroup.com/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=citiviewgroup.com CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US 13 Oct 2026 11 Jan 2027 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA256 8a7728d4868f4aad0ea11bebd49d9317
SANs: citiviewgroup.com, mcp.citiviewgroup.com, *.mcp.citiviewgroup.com
CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US 13 Dec 2023 20 Feb 2029 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3
CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE 15 Nov 2023 28 Jan 2028 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of mcp.citiviewgroup.com. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
com. present 19718 13 Verified
citiviewgroup.com. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://mcp.citiviewgroup.com/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://mcp.citiviewgroup.com/mcp Inconclusive 406
MCP tools · 211 exposed · ~25,582 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
vulns ~122

Package vulnerability check for coding agents: known CVEs/GHSAs for an npm, PyPI, Go, Maven, crates.io, RubyGems, NuGet or Packagist package version, with severity, fixed versions and the latest release (OSV.dev). Costs $0.003 USDC per call (x402).

NameTypeReqDescription
ecosystemstring–npm (default), pypi, go, maven, crates.io, rubygems, nuget, packagist
packagestringyes–
versionstring––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

wages ~115

Salary data for any job title: employment, mean and median annual and hourly pay, and 10th to 90th percentile annual pay, nationally and for a US state, from the BLS occupational wage survey. Job titles are matched to SOC codes automatically. Costs $0.006 USDC per call (x402).

NameTypeReqDescription
occupationstring–Job title
socstring–6-digit SOC code instead, e.g. 15-1252
statestring–State name or code

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

wallet ~92

Wallet snapshot on Base or Ethereum: native ETH balance, nonzero balances of the major tokens (USDC, USDT, WETH, DAI, cbBTC, WBTC and more), transaction count and contract flag. Costs $0.0028 USDC per call (x402).

NameTypeReqDescription
addressstringyes0x EVM address
chainstring–base | ethereum (default base)

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

wallet_nfts ~99

NFT holdings for any wallet on Base, Ethereum, Arbitrum, Optimism or Polygon, grouped by collection with counts, a sample item and image, OpenSea floor price and an estimated floor value. Spam NFTs are excluded. Costs $0.005 USDC per call (x402).

NameTypeReqDescription
chainstring–base (default) | ethereum | arbitrum | optimism | polygon
walletstringyes0x address

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

wallet_portfolio ~111

Multi-chain wallet portfolio: every token a wallet holds on Ethereum, Base, Arbitrum, Optimism and Polygon (or Solana) with live USD prices, value per token and per chain, and the total. Spam tokens without a price are filtered out. Costs $0.005 USDC per call (x402).

NameTypeReqDescription
networksstring–Optional comma list: ethereum, base, arbitrum, optimism, polygon
walletstringyes0x address or Solana address

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

wallet_watch ~148

Wallet activity alerts: watch any wallet on Base, Ethereum, Arbitrum, Optimism or Polygon for 7 days; every incoming or outgoing transfer (ETH, tokens, NFTs) is POSTed to your webhook URL within about 10 minutes. Check status with the watch id. Costs $0.02 USDC per call (x402).

NameTypeReqDescription
addressstring–0x wallet to watch
chainstring–base (default) | ethereum | arbitrum | optimism | polygon
daysinteger–1-7
idstring–Check an existing watch
webhook_urlstring–Your https URL that receives the alerts

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

watch ~72

Page change watch: reports what changed on a web page since your last check (lines added and removed). The first call saves a snapshot; each later call compares and updates it. Snapshots are private to the paying wallet. Costs $0.005 USDC per call (x402).

NameTypeReqDescription
urlstringyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

wayback ~91

Web archive: the Internet Archive snapshot of a page closest to a date, with the archived page text and a list of recent snapshots. See what a page said before it changed. Costs $0.005 USDC per call (x402).

NameTypeReqDescription
datestring–YYYY-MM-DD (default: latest)
textboolean–Include page text (default true)
urlstringyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

weather ~112

Current weather and up to 14-day forecast for any place name or lat/lon: temperature, feels-like, humidity, rain chance, wind, sunrise and sunset. Metric or imperial. Costs $0.004 USDC per call (x402).

NameTypeReqDescription
daysinteger–1 to 14, default 3
latnumber––
lonnumber––
placestring–Place name, e.g. Toronto
unitsstring–metric | imperial

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

x402_check ~87

x402 endpoint checker: tests any paid x402 URL for a correct 402, price and networks, pay-to address, discovery metadata, CORS, response time and Coinbase's validator, and lists every issue to fix. Costs $0.005 USDC per call (x402).

NameTypeReqDescription
methodstring–GET (default) or POST
urlstringyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

x402_find ~98

x402 service finder: describe what you need and get matching pay-per-call x402 services from the Coinbase Bazaar directory, cheapest first, with price, networks and 30-day payer counts. Costs $0.002 USDC per call (x402).

NameTypeReqDescription
limitinteger––
max_pricenumber–USD per call
networkstring–base | solana | polygon ...
qstringyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the Citiview Agent Market MCP server?

Citiview Agent Market is a hosted endpoint at https://mcp.citiviewgroup.com/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · mcp.citiviewgroup.com

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http com-citiviewgroup-mcp-agent-market 'https://mcp.citiviewgroup.com/mcp'
Common questions

What is the Citiview Agent Market MCP server?

Citiview Agent Market is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.citiviewgroup.mcp/agent-market. 186 pay-per-call tools: search, LLMs, UK KYB, FRED, Census, maps, crypto. x402 USDC. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://mcp.citiviewgroup.com/mcp).

Is the Citiview Agent Market MCP server safe to use?

Citiview Agent Market scores 67 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the Citiview Agent Market MCP server expose?

Citiview Agent Market exposes 211 tools: search, markdown, extract, scrape, pdf, and 206 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 25,582 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the Citiview Agent Market MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to Citiview Agent Market without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the Citiview Agent Market MCP server still maintained?

Citiview Agent Market is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 17 October 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.