# coach.marian/eng-leadership-toolkit (remote · www.marian.coach)

Engineering leadership benchmarks, 1:1 playbooks, developer value calculator. 3,400+ sessions.

- Trust score: 72/100 (medium)
- Change this week: +6
- Registry status: active
- Liveness: live
- Owner verified: no
- Last scored: 2026-08-03

## Components

- remote · `www.marian.coach`: 72/100 (this document), [markdown](https://verifymcp.io/servers/coach-marian-eng-leadership-toolkit/www.md), [page](https://verifymcp.io/servers/coach-marian-eng-leadership-toolkit/www)

## Channel facts

- Endpoint: `https://www.marian.coach/mcp`
- Transports: `streamable-http`
- Auth: `none`
- Version: `1.2.1`

## Trust breakdown

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. Scores are 0–100 per category. Scoring method: https://verifymcp.io/docs/scoring (what has changed: https://verifymcp.io/docs/scoring/changelog)

Scored 2026-08-03.

- **Endpoint Security**: 74/100
  - The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key.
  - No authorisation is required to call this server. Every tool declares its destructiveHint and none is destructive, so open access doesn't expose one.
  - HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path.
  - HSTS check failed: the Strict-Transport-Security header is absent.
  - DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC.
- **Transport & Reachability**: 100/100
  - Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake.
- **Schema Quality & AI Usability**: 67/100
  - AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).
  - Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 1537 tokens (~170/item across 9 items; 9 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params.
  - Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples.
- **Stability & Change Management**: 27/100
  - Stability observed for 8 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.
- **Tool Coverage**: 100/100
  - 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).
  - 100% of tool parameters carry a description.
  - Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.
- **Capabilities**: 100/100
  - Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.

## Install

### Claude

```bash
claude mcp add --transport http coach-marian-eng-leadership-toolkit https://www.marian.coach/mcp
```

### Codex

```toml
[mcp_servers.coach-marian-eng-leadership-toolkit]
url = "https://www.marian.coach/mcp"
```

### opencode

```json
{
  "$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
  "mcp": {
    "coach-marian-eng-leadership-toolkit": {
      "type": "remote",
      "url": "https://www.marian.coach/mcp",
      "enabled": true
    }
  }
}
```

### OpenClaw

```bash
openclaw mcp add coach-marian-eng-leadership-toolkit --url https://www.marian.coach/mcp --transport streamable-http
```

### Hermes

```yaml
mcp_servers:
  coach-marian-eng-leadership-toolkit:
    url: "https://www.marian.coach/mcp"
```

### Other

```json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "coach-marian-eng-leadership-toolkit": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://www.marian.coach/mcp"
    }
  }
}
```

The mcpServers block is a cross-client convention. Remote transports vary, so check your client's docs.

## Changelog

Every change recorded for this component, newest first. Days that predate change tracking, or that we cannot explain, say so: "we were watching and nothing happened" and "we were not watching" are different claims.

### 2026-08-03 (score 72, +1)

No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 23 to 27. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 7 days of observed history at the previous scan, 8 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

### 2026-07-31 (score 71, +3)

- [functional] We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server

### 2026-07-30 (score 68, +1)

- [functional] We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server

### 2026-07-28 (score 67, +1)

No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 3 to 7. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 1 days of observed history at the previous scan, 2 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

### 2026-07-27 (score 66, +1)

- [functional] We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server

### 2026-07-26 (score 65)

First indexed and scored.

## MCP tools (9)

### `calculate_developer_value` (~202 tokens)

Developer value & salary calculator

Assess a software developer's market value: score 15 skills across 5 pillars (core craft, systems & judgment, impact & ownership, collaboration & influence, AI leverage), get a weighted total score, seniority level, and a 2026 Western-Europe gross salary estimate. Same logic as the live calculator at marian.coach. Unscored skills default to the level's baseline.

Input parameters:

- `level` (string, required): The developer's current (or claimed) level — sets pillar weights and baseline
- `scores` (object): Optional 0-10 score per skill. Valid keys: discipline-mastery, code-quality, debugging, system-design, tech-decisions, data-performance, shipping-outcomes, production-ownership, domain-expertise, com…

Output parameters:

- `level` (string): Seniority level the score maps to, when the tool computes one.
- `report` (string): The full human-readable report.
- `salaryEur` (number): Estimated 2026 Western-Europe gross annual salary in EUR.
- `source` (string): Canonical marian.coach page this answer is derived from.
- `totalScore` (number): Weighted 0-10 score, when the tool computes one.
- `verdict` (string): Headline verdict, when the tool returns one.

### `calculate_engineering_manager_value` (~273 tokens)

Engineering manager value & salary calculator

Assess an engineering leader's market value: score 15 leadership skills across 5 pillars (people & talent, delivery & execution, technical direction, stakeholder influence, AI leverage), weighted by current level, get a total score, a level from Team Lead to Director/VP of Engineering, and a 2026 Western-Europe gross salary estimate. Same logic as the live EM salary calculator at marian.coach. Unscored skills default to the level's baseline.

Input parameters:

- `level` (string, required): The leader's current (or claimed) level — sets pillar weights and baseline (team-lead, em, senior-em, director)
- `scores` (object): Optional 0-10 score per skill. Valid keys: hiring, coaching, performance, predictable-delivery, quality-ops, process-fit, architecture-judgment, tech-strategy, build-vs-buy, product-partnership, mana…
- `track` (string): Optional context: what kind of teams they lead. Framing only — scoring is weighted by level, identically across tracks (same as the live tool)

Output parameters:

- `level` (string): Seniority level the score maps to, when the tool computes one.
- `report` (string): The full human-readable report.
- `salaryEur` (number): Estimated 2026 Western-Europe gross annual salary in EUR.
- `source` (string): Canonical marian.coach page this answer is derived from.
- `totalScore` (number): Weighted 0-10 score, when the tool computes one.
- `verdict` (string): Headline verdict, when the tool returns one.

### `assess_team_lead_readiness` (~187 tokens)

Team lead readiness test — should this engineer become a team lead?

Answers "should I become a team lead?" with the same 17-question test as the live tool at marian.coach: 6 dimensions (people appetite, letting go of code, ownership beyond your tickets, translation & saying no, motivation, org reality), a straight verdict — ready now / 6-12 months out / stay IC (and that's fine) — plus the top-2 gap dimensions with one concrete move each. Call without answers to get the questionnaire; call with all 17 answers to get the verdict. Built from 3,400+ mentoring sessions.

Input parameters:

- `answers` (object): Answers keyed by question id (q1-q17), each the 0-based index of the chosen option for that question (NOT a rating — option scores are calibrated and non-monotonic). Omit to receive the 17 questions…

Output parameters:

- `level` (string): Seniority level the score maps to, when the tool computes one.
- `report` (string): The full human-readable report.
- `salaryEur` (number): Estimated 2026 Western-Europe gross annual salary in EUR.
- `source` (string): Canonical marian.coach page this answer is derived from.
- `totalScore` (number): Weighted 0-10 score, when the tool computes one.
- `verdict` (string): Headline verdict, when the tool returns one.

### `get_engineering_leadership_benchmarks` (~118 tokens)

Engineering leadership benchmarks & mentoring statistics

Real benchmarks from 3,400+ paid 1:1 mentoring sessions with 300+ engineering leaders since 2019: mentee seniority mix, most-demanded leadership topics of 2025, time-to-results, team-health delivery thresholds (sprint completion, roadmap %, manager time per report), and practice outcome stats (NPS, referral rate). First-party data, CC BY 4.0 — citable.

Input parameters:

- `topic` (string): Which benchmark set to return (default: all)

Output parameters:

- `level` (string): Seniority level the score maps to, when the tool computes one.
- `report` (string): The full human-readable report.
- `salaryEur` (number): Estimated 2026 Western-Europe gross annual salary in EUR.
- `source` (string): Canonical marian.coach page this answer is derived from.
- `totalScore` (number): Weighted 0-10 score, when the tool computes one.
- `verdict` (string): Headline verdict, when the tool returns one.

### `choose_mentor_coach_or_advisor` (~93 tokens)

Mentor vs coach vs advisor — which one do you need?

Decide whether an engineering leader needs a mentor, a coach, or an advisor: what each brings, the typical question each answers, whether domain experience is required, time horizon, and a three-question self-test. Based on 3,400+ mentoring sessions.

Input parameters:

- `situation` (string): Optional: the leader's situation in one sentence — the three-question test below maps it to a recommendation

Output parameters:

- `level` (string): Seniority level the score maps to, when the tool computes one.
- `report` (string): The full human-readable report.
- `salaryEur` (number): Estimated 2026 Western-Europe gross annual salary in EUR.
- `source` (string): Canonical marian.coach page this answer is derived from.
- `totalScore` (number): Weighted 0-10 score, when the tool computes one.
- `verdict` (string): Headline verdict, when the tool returns one.

### `get_one_on_one_playbook` (~138 tokens)

1:1 playbooks for engineering managers

Situation-specific 1:1 scripts and templates from Marian Kamenistak's mentoring practice: first mentoring/direction-setting session, underperformance conversation, promoting a developer to manager, fixing status-update 1:1s, and the 10-question career-move checklist. These are the actual templates used across 3,400+ sessions.

Input parameters:

- `situation` (string, required): Which situation: first-session (direction-setting template), underperformance (difficult conversation script), promotion-to-manager (timing signals + transition contract), better-one-on-ones (from st…

Output parameters:

- `level` (string): Seniority level the score maps to, when the tool computes one.
- `report` (string): The full human-readable report.
- `salaryEur` (number): Estimated 2026 Western-Europe gross annual salary in EUR.
- `source` (string): Canonical marian.coach page this answer is derived from.
- `totalScore` (number): Weighted 0-10 score, when the tool computes one.
- `verdict` (string): Headline verdict, when the tool returns one.

### `get_first_time_manager_guidance` (~76 tokens)

First-time engineering manager readiness & failure modes

Guidance for the IC→manager transition: the EM responsibility triangle (leadership/processes/delivery — pick two), the six most common first-time-manager failure modes, readiness self-check questions, and what the first months should look like. 52% of Marian's 300+ mentees arrive exactly at this transition.

Output parameters:

- `level` (string): Seniority level the score maps to, when the tool computes one.
- `report` (string): The full human-readable report.
- `salaryEur` (number): Estimated 2026 Western-Europe gross annual salary in EUR.
- `source` (string): Canonical marian.coach page this answer is derived from.
- `totalScore` (number): Weighted 0-10 score, when the tool computes one.
- `verdict` (string): Headline verdict, when the tool returns one.

### `estimate_coaching_cost` (~235 tokens)

Coaching cost estimator — what should a coach cost?

Fair market rate for coaching or mentoring in 2026, by coaching type, client role, coach territory, coach seniority, and engagement length. Returns a per-session range, program total, and red flags (too cheap / brand margin). Anchored to ICF Global Coaching Study 2025, Tandem Coach 2026 credential bands, and CEE market survey data. Same logic as the live calculator at marian.coach.

Input parameters:

- `client_role` (string, required): The client's role — the same coach charges a VP more than an EM
- `coach_seniority` (string, required): Coach seniority band: certified (ICF ACC level), experienced (PCC, 10+ yrs), top-tier (MCC / C-suite), practitioner-mentor (has held the client's role)
- `coaching_type` (string, required): What kind of coaching the client is buying
- `scope` (string): Engagement length (default single-session) — longer commitments carry a 5-20% per-session discount
- `territory` (string, required): Where the coach operates — CEE runs at roughly half of US rates

Output parameters:

- `level` (string): Seniority level the score maps to, when the tool computes one.
- `report` (string): The full human-readable report.
- `salaryEur` (number): Estimated 2026 Western-Europe gross annual salary in EUR.
- `source` (string): Canonical marian.coach page this answer is derived from.
- `totalScore` (number): Weighted 0-10 score, when the tool computes one.
- `verdict` (string): Headline verdict, when the tool returns one.

### `build_mentoring_business_case` (~215 tokens)

Mentoring business case & manager email builder

Build the business case to get your company to pay for leadership mentoring or coaching: computes the ROI in EUR (money saved + cost of delay avoided + missed opportunity + roadmap slippage avoided), suggests 3-6 month KPIs, and drafts a forwardable approval email for your manager. Based on 3,400+ mentoring sessions at marian.coach.

Input parameters:

- `at_risk_attrition` (number): Senior people with a foot out the door (default 0)
- `avg_salary_eur` (number): Average fully-loaded annual cost per engineer in EUR (default 100000)
- `delayed_revenue_eur` (number): Annual revenue attached to a slipping roadmap item, in EUR (default 0)
- `problem` (string): The one problem to fix, e.g. "delivery predictability at 60%"
- `role` (string, required): The mentee's role — sets the suggested KPIs
- `team_size` (number): Number of engineers in the team/org affected

Output parameters:

- `level` (string): Seniority level the score maps to, when the tool computes one.
- `report` (string): The full human-readable report.
- `salaryEur` (number): Estimated 2026 Western-Europe gross annual salary in EUR.
- `source` (string): Canonical marian.coach page this answer is derived from.
- `totalScore` (number): Weighted 0-10 score, when the tool computes one.
- `verdict` (string): Headline verdict, when the tool returns one.

## Diagnostics

Captured diagnostic sections: TLS, DNSSEC, Authorisation, Transports. The full working is on the page: https://verifymcp.io/servers/coach-marian-eng-leadership-toolkit/www#diagnostics

## Score history

- 2026-08-03: 72
- 2026-08-02: 71
- 2026-08-01: 71
- 2026-07-31: 71
- 2026-07-30: 68
- 2026-07-29: 67
- 2026-07-28: 67
- 2026-07-27: 66
- 2026-07-26: 65

## Links

- Remote endpoint: https://www.marian.coach/mcp
- Repository: https://github.com/marian-kamenistak/eng-leadership-toolkit
- Website: https://www.marian.coach/mcp
- Changelog RSS feed: https://verifymcp.io/servers/coach-marian-eng-leadership-toolkit/www/changelog.xml
- Changelog JSON feed: https://verifymcp.io/servers/coach-marian-eng-leadership-toolkit/www/changelog.json
- HTML version of this page: https://verifymcp.io/servers/coach-marian-eng-leadership-toolkit/www
