# io.github.CloudCorpRecords/visprobe (oci · ghcr.io/cloudcorprecords/visprobe)

AI-visibility audit: AI crawler access, identity files, page signals, hosted analysis.

- Trust score: 41/100 (low)
- Registry status: active
- Liveness: live
- Owner verified: no
- Last scored: 2026-11-05

## Components

- npm · `@reneturcios/visprobe`: 70/100, [markdown](https://verifymcp.io/servers/cloudcorprecords-visprobe/reneturcios-visprobe.md), [page](https://verifymcp.io/servers/cloudcorprecords-visprobe/reneturcios-visprobe)
- oci · `ghcr.io/cloudcorprecords/visprobe`: 41/100 (this document), [markdown](https://verifymcp.io/servers/cloudcorprecords-visprobe/ghcr-io-cloudcorprecords-visprobe.md), [page](https://verifymcp.io/servers/cloudcorprecords-visprobe/ghcr-io-cloudcorprecords-visprobe)

## Channel facts

- Registry: `oci`
- Package: `ghcr.io/cloudcorprecords/visprobe`
- Version: `0.1.0`
- Transport: `stdio`

## Trust breakdown

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. Scores are 0–100 per category. Scoring method: https://verifymcp.io/docs/scoring (what has changed: https://verifymcp.io/docs/scoring/changelog)

Scored 2026-11-05.

- **Supply Chain Security**: 0/100
  - No malware scan is available for this kind of package: the supply-chain vendors we use do not cover it. This is a permanent gap in our coverage, not a finding about the package.
  - Known CVEs could not be checked: this artifact ships no SBOM or dependency manifest, so there is no dependency list to read.
  - Install-script risk not yet assessed.
  - Dependency health could not be checked: this artifact ships no SBOM or dependency manifest, so there is no dependency list to read.
- **Provenance & Transparency**: 45/100
  - Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL.
  - Provenance check failed: no build-provenance attestation is published.
  - Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).
  - Actively maintained (last published 2 days ago).
  - Disclosure check failed: no security disclosure policy was found in the source repository.
- **Schema Quality & AI Usability**: 68/100
  - AI-judged instruction clarity (good).
  - Tool/resource definitions use about 537 tokens (~53/item across 10 items; 10 tools + 0 resources), lean.
  - Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples.
- **Stability & Change Management**: 10/100
  - Stability observed for 3 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.
- **Tool Coverage**: 100/100
  - 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).
  - 100% of tool parameters carry a description.
- **Tool Safety**: 100/100
  - No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.
  - We read all 10 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.
  - An AI judge read all 10 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.
- **Capabilities**: 100/100
  - Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.

**Unverified: 1 category.** A category scored 0 because we could not verify it: a data source with nothing on this package, evidence we could not reach, or a check we could not run. We only credit what we can confirm.

## Install

### How do I install the io.github.CloudCorpRecords/visprobe MCP server?

io.github.CloudCorpRecords/visprobe runs locally as a container image, launched with docker run --rm -i ghcr.io/cloudcorprecords/visprobe:0.1.0. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 3 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

### Claude

```bash
claude mcp add cloudcorprecords-visprobe -- docker run --rm -i ghcr.io/cloudcorprecords/visprobe:0.1.0
```

### Cursor

```json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "cloudcorprecords-visprobe": {
      "command": "docker",
      "args": [
        "run",
        "--rm",
        "-i",
        "ghcr.io/cloudcorprecords/visprobe:0.1.0"
      ]
    }
  }
}
```

### VS Code

```json
{
  "servers": {
    "cloudcorprecords-visprobe": {
      "command": "docker",
      "args": [
        "run",
        "--rm",
        "-i",
        "ghcr.io/cloudcorprecords/visprobe:0.1.0"
      ]
    }
  }
}
```

### Codex

```bash
codex mcp add cloudcorprecords-visprobe -- docker run --rm -i ghcr.io/cloudcorprecords/visprobe:0.1.0
```

### opencode

```json
{
  "$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
  "mcp": {
    "cloudcorprecords-visprobe": {
      "type": "local",
      "command": [
        "docker",
        "run",
        "--rm",
        "-i",
        "ghcr.io/cloudcorprecords/visprobe:0.1.0"
      ],
      "enabled": true
    }
  }
}
```

### Hermes

```yaml
mcp_servers:
  cloudcorprecords-visprobe:
    command: "docker"
    args: ["run", "--rm", "-i", "ghcr.io/cloudcorprecords/visprobe:0.1.0"]
```

### Netclaw

```json
{
  "McpServers": {
    "cloudcorprecords-visprobe": {
      "Transport": "stdio",
      "Command": "docker",
      "Arguments": [
        "run",
        "--rm",
        "-i",
        "ghcr.io/cloudcorprecords/visprobe:0.1.0"
      ]
    }
  }
}
```

### Other

```json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "cloudcorprecords-visprobe": {
      "command": "docker",
      "args": [
        "run",
        "--rm",
        "-i",
        "ghcr.io/cloudcorprecords/visprobe:0.1.0"
      ]
    }
  }
}
```

## Changelog

Every change recorded for this component, newest first. Days that predate change tracking, or that we cannot explain, say so: "we were watching and nothing happened" and "we were not watching" are different claims.

### 2026-11-05 (score 41, +1)

No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 7 to 10. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 2 days of observed history at the previous scan, 3 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

### 2026-11-03 (score 40, +1)

No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 0 to 3. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 0 days of observed history at the previous scan, 1 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

### 2026-11-02 (score 39)

First indexed and scored.

## MCP tools (10)

### `check_ai_access` (~73 tokens)

Which AI crawlers `robots.txt` lets in, separating the ones that fetch a page to answer a live question from the ones that only collect training data. Blocking the first kind is what makes a site invisible; blocking the second costs nothing.

Input parameters:

- `url` (string, required): The site to check (URL or domain)

### `check_identity_files` (~49 tokens)

Which of the ten identity files exist — `llms.txt`, `ai.json`, `identity.json` and the rest.

Input parameters:

- `url` (string, required): The site to check (URL or domain)

### `check_page_signals` (~48 tokens)

Title, description, canonical, hreflang, and the Schema.org types in the page's JSON-LD.

Input parameters:

- `url` (string, required): The site to check (URL or domain)

### `check_identity` (~61 tokens)

Free and instant: which answer-engine crawlers get in, the identity files, structured data, an identity score out of 100 and what that reading says to fix. No model asked.

Input parameters:

- `url` (string, required): The site to check (URL or domain)

### `visibility_fixes` (~73 tokens)

The fix plan, most important first: what to change, why, how many points it should recover, the pages it applies to, and a paste-ready file when there is one. Signed in, built from your latest audit of the site.

Input parameters:

- `url` (string, required): The site to check (URL or domain)

### `compare_sites` (~61 tokens)

Your site and a competitor's, read the same way, side by side, and who is ahead on each count.

Input parameters:

- `other` (string, required): The competitor site (URL or domain)
- `url` (string, required): The site to check (URL or domain)

### `visibility_history` (~46 tokens)

How the reading moved: the INITE Atlas's weekly readings for a site it carries, and your own audits.

Input parameters:

- `url` (string, required): The site to check (URL or domain)

### `analyze_site` (~66 tokens)

Starts the audit that also asks the answer engines whether they name the site, and returns a `run_id`. A survey without an account, the teaser on a free plan, the whole audit on a paid one.

Input parameters:

- `url` (string, required): The site to check (URL or domain)

### `get_analysis` (~43 tokens)

Progress while it runs; the score out of 100 and what to fix first once it finishes.

Input parameters:

- `run_id` (string, required): The run id returned by analyze_site

### `my_reports` (~17 tokens)

Signed in: your audits, newest first.

## Diagnostics

Captured diagnostic sections: Provenance. The full working is on the page: https://verifymcp.io/servers/cloudcorprecords-visprobe/ghcr-io-cloudcorprecords-visprobe#diagnostics

## Score history

- 2026-11-05: 41
- 2026-11-04: 40
- 2026-11-03: 40
- 2026-11-02: 39

## Common questions

### What is the io.github.CloudCorpRecords/visprobe MCP server?

io.github.CloudCorpRecords/visprobe is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.CloudCorpRecords/visprobe. AI-visibility audit: AI crawler access, identity files, page signals, hosted analysis. This page covers its container image (ghcr.io/cloudcorprecords/visprobe).

### Is the io.github.CloudCorpRecords/visprobe MCP server safe to use?

io.github.CloudCorpRecords/visprobe scores 41 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

### What tools does the io.github.CloudCorpRecords/visprobe MCP server expose?

io.github.CloudCorpRecords/visprobe exposes 10 tools: check_ai_access, check_identity_files, check_page_signals, check_identity, visibility_fixes, and 5 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 537 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

### Is the io.github.CloudCorpRecords/visprobe MCP server still maintained?

io.github.CloudCorpRecords/visprobe is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.

### What licence is the io.github.CloudCorpRecords/visprobe MCP server under?

io.github.CloudCorpRecords/visprobe declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.

## Links

- GitHub Container Registry: https://ghcr.io/cloudcorprecords/visprobe
- Repository: https://github.com/CloudCorpRecords/visprobe
- Changelog RSS feed: https://verifymcp.io/servers/cloudcorprecords-visprobe/ghcr-io-cloudcorprecords-visprobe.xml
- Changelog JSON feed: https://verifymcp.io/servers/cloudcorprecords-visprobe/ghcr-io-cloudcorprecords-visprobe.json
- HTML version of this page: https://verifymcp.io/servers/cloudcorprecords-visprobe/ghcr-io-cloudcorprecords-visprobe