PromptSpeak Governance
NPM · @CHRBAILEY/PROMPTSPEAK-MCP-SERVER · SCANNED SEP 25
Pre-execution governance for AI agents. Validates tool calls before they execute.
Available components
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Supply Chain Security98
- No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
- No known CVEs affecting this package version or its production dependencies.Pass
- No install/post-install scripts declared.Pass
- 53 of 133 dependencies flagged as unhealthy (2 deprecated). View diagnostics → Partial
Provenance & Transparency48
- Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
- Provenance check failed: no build-provenance attestation is published. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
- Actively maintained (last published 157 days ago).Pass
- Publishes a security disclosure policy (SECURITY.md).Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability67
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Tool/resource definitions use about 3522 tokens (~62/item across 56 items; 56 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management87
- Stability observed for 26 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage89
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 68% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety75
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- 0 of 5 tool(s) whose name or description implies an irreversible operation declare an MCP destructiveHint annotation; "ps_execute" implies "execute" and declares no destructiveHint at all, which the MCP spec reads as destructive by default. See how to fix → Fail
- An AI judge read all 56 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
How do I install the PromptSpeak Governance MCP server?
PromptSpeak Governance runs locally as an npm package, launched with npx -y @chrbailey/promptspeak-mcp-server. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
npm · @chrbailey/promptspeak-mcp-server
claude mcp add chrbailey-promptspeak -- npx -y @chrbailey/promptspeak-mcp-server
{
"mcpServers": {
"chrbailey-promptspeak": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"@chrbailey/promptspeak-mcp-server"
]
}
}
} {
"servers": {
"chrbailey-promptspeak": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"@chrbailey/promptspeak-mcp-server"
]
}
}
} codex mcp add chrbailey-promptspeak -- npx -y @chrbailey/promptspeak-mcp-server
{
"$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
"mcp": {
"chrbailey-promptspeak": {
"type": "local",
"command": [
"npx",
"-y",
"@chrbailey/promptspeak-mcp-server"
],
"enabled": true
}
}
} openclaw mcp add chrbailey-promptspeak --command npx --arg -y --arg @chrbailey/promptspeak-mcp-server
mcp_servers:
chrbailey-promptspeak:
command: "npx"
args: ["-y", "@chrbailey/promptspeak-mcp-server"] {
"McpServers": {
"chrbailey-promptspeak": {
"Transport": "stdio",
"Command": "npx",
"Arguments": [
"-y",
"@chrbailey/promptspeak-mcp-server"
]
}
}
} assistant mcp add chrbailey-promptspeak -t stdio -c npx -a -y @chrbailey/promptspeak-mcp-server
{
"mcpServers": {
"chrbailey-promptspeak": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"@chrbailey/promptspeak-mcp-server"
]
}
}
} Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 25 Sept 26 +1
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 23 Sept 26 −3
- Stability: pass → 0.80 functional
- 22 Sept 26 +1
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
- 20 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 90 to 93. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 27 days of observed history at the previous scan, 28 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 18 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 83 to 87. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 25 days of observed history at the previous scan, 26 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 16 Sept 26 −2
- Stability: pass → 0.80 functional
- 15 Sept 26 0
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
- 14 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 93 to 97. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 28 days of observed history at the previous scan, 29 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 25 Sept 2026 · Analysed npm/@chrbailey/promptspeak-mcp-server@0.4.1
Provenance No attestation
The registry publishes no build provenance for this version, so there is nothing to verify.
| Result | No attestation |
|---|---|
| Ecosystem | npm |
Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →
Dependencies 133 packages
| Packages resolved | 133 |
|---|---|
| Deprecated | 2 |
| Stale | 52 |
| Tree resolution | Complete |
Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
ps_symbol_list_unverified ~145
List symbols that require human review. Returns symbols flagged for review due to: - Accusatory claims without sufficient evidence - Missing alternative explanations - High-stakes claims (fraud, violations, diagnoses) - Low confidence scores Use this to find claims that need human validation before action.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| claim_type | string | – | Filter by claim type (e.g., ACCUSATORY for fraud allegations) |
| limit | number | – | Maximum results to return (default: 50) |
| max_confidence | number | – | Maximum confidence level to include |
| min_confidence | number | – | Minimum confidence level to include |
| offset | number | – | Pagination offset |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
ps_symbol_stats ~16
Get statistics about the symbol registry.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
ps_symbol_update ~92
Update an existing symbol. Creates a new version with updated hash.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| change_description | string | yes | Description of what changed (for changelog) |
| changed_by | string | – | Who made the change |
| changes | object | yes | Fields to update (who, what, why, where, when, how, commanders_intent, requirements, etc.) |
| symbolId | string | yes | Symbol ID to update |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
ps_symbol_verify ~189
Record human verification of a symbol claim. Use this tool to upgrade or dispute claims based on human review: - VERIFIED: Human expert has confirmed the claim is accurate - CORROBORATED: Additional evidence supports the claim - DISPUTED: Human reviewer found the claim to be incorrect or misleading Important: Accusatory claims (fraud, violations) should be DISPUTED if they lack evidence or have plausible alternative explanations.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| evidence_added | array | – | List of evidence sources that support this verification |
| new_confidence | number | – | New confidence level (0-1). Auto-calculated if not provided. |
| new_status | string | yes | New epistemic status for the claim |
| notes | string | – | Notes explaining the verification decision |
| reviewer | string | yes | Identifier of the human reviewer |
| symbolId | string | yes | Symbol ID to verify |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
ps_validate ~91
Validate a PromptSpeak frame. Returns validation report with errors, warnings, and suggestions.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| frame | string | yes | The PromptSpeak frame to validate (e.g., "⊕◊▶β") |
| parentFrame | string | – | Optional parent frame for chain validation |
| strict | boolean | – | If true, warnings also cause validation failure |
| validationLevel | string | – | Level of validation to perform |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
ps_validate_batch ~53
Validate multiple frames at once. Useful for validating delegation chains.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| frames | array | yes | – |
| stopOnFirstError | boolean | – | – |
| strict | boolean | – | – |
| validationLevel | string | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
What is the PromptSpeak Governance MCP server?
PromptSpeak Governance is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.chrbailey/promptspeak. Pre-execution governance for AI agents. Validates tool calls before they execute. This page covers its npm package (@chrbailey/promptspeak-mcp-server).
Is the PromptSpeak Governance MCP server safe to use?
PromptSpeak Governance scores 79 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We found no known CVEs affecting it as of 25 September 2026. It declares no install or post-install scripts. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the PromptSpeak Governance MCP server expose?
PromptSpeak Governance exposes 56 tools: ps_validate, ps_validate_batch, ps_execute, ps_execute_dry_run, ps_execute_batch, and 51 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 3,522 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Is the PromptSpeak Governance MCP server still maintained?
PromptSpeak Governance is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 25 September 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.
What licence is the PromptSpeak Governance MCP server under?
PromptSpeak Governance declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.