SiteCheck Agent Intel & Dev
REMOTE · API.FADEANDCO.WORKERS.DEV
135 pay-per-call agent tools: agent intelligence, token risk, developer and AI data tools. x402
Available components
Last scanned (2 hours ago)
Scores higher than 55% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 24 Oct 2026.
Category Crypto and Web3
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security63
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Every tool declares its destructiveHint and none is destructive, so open access doesn't expose one. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS check failed: the endpoint is reachable over plaintext HTTP. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- HSTS check failed: the Strict-Transport-Security header is absent. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability68
- AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 21425 tokens (~158/item across 135 items; 135 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management3
- Stability observed for 1 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
- Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 135 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 136 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 24 Oct 26 +1
- The server rewrote its instructions, which are the text every model session reads security
- Tool “agent_intel_invoice_document_ocr” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “agent_intel_speech_to_text_transcribe_turbo” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
- “agent_intel_invoice_document_ocr” added an optional parameter “imageUrl” cosmetic
- “agent_intel_speech_to_text_transcribe_turbo” added an optional parameter “audioUrl” cosmetic
- “agent_intel_invoice_document_ocr” reworded the description of “imageBase64” cosmetic
- “agent_intel_invoice_document_ocr” reworded the description of “mime” cosmetic
- “agent_intel_speech_to_text_transcribe_turbo” reworded the description of “audioBase64” cosmetic
- “agent_intel_invoice_document_ocr” made “imageBase64” optional cosmetic
- “agent_intel_speech_to_text_transcribe_turbo” made “audioBase64” optional cosmetic
- 23 Oct 26 65
First indexed and scored.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 24 Oct 2026 · Probed https://api.fadeandco.workers.dev/mcp?ref=registry
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=fadeandco.workers.dev | CN=YE1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US | 25 Sept 2026 | 24 Dec 2026 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 6333e519a4cacb6a887e102975c050b4fca |
| SANs: *.fadeandco.workers.dev, fadeandco.workers.dev | ||||||
| CN=YE1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) | CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US | 3 Sept 2025 | 2 Sept 2028 | ECDSA 384 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 5ddd70dd31f801c85c186a7a04b80afe |
| CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | ECDSA 384 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 872165fc34b6e5fba8add5b3705fb53a |
| CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | ECDSA 384 | SHA256-RSA | 6c8f1dc727c7117f7baf853ac980f9cd |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of api.fadeandco.workers.dev. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| dev. | present | 60074 | 8 | Verified |
| workers.dev. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://api.fadeandco.workers.dev/mcp?ref=registry | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://api.fadeandco.workers.dev/mcp?ref=registry | Served over HTTP | 200 |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
dev_youtube_channel Dev Youtube Channel ~117
YouTube channel public details by @handle from the channel page: channel id, name, description (YouTube truncates it), subscriber count as YouTube rounds it (e.g. 44.7 million) and exact video count. Public page data; English locale; no per-video stats. Price: $0.002 in USDC per successful call, paid with x402 (Base, Solana or Arc); failed calls are not charged.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| handle | string | yes | Channel handle without @, e.g. TED |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| channelId | – | – | – |
| checkedAt | – | – | – |
| description | – | – | – |
| handle | – | – | – |
| name | – | – | – |
| source | – | – | – |
| subscribersText | – | – | – |
| videoCount | – | – | – |
No examples provided.
How do I install the SiteCheck Agent Intel & Dev MCP server?
SiteCheck Agent Intel & Dev is a hosted endpoint at https://api.fadeandco.workers.dev/mcp?ref=registry, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · api.fadeandco.workers.dev
claude mcp add --transport http bck-stack-sitecheck-agent-intel-dev 'https://api.fadeandco.workers.dev/mcp?ref=registry'
What is the SiteCheck Agent Intel & Dev MCP server?
SiteCheck Agent Intel & Dev is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.bck-stack/sitecheck-agent-intel-dev. 135 pay-per-call agent tools: agent intelligence, token risk, developer and AI data tools. x402. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://api.fadeandco.workers.dev/mcp?ref=registry).
Is the SiteCheck Agent Intel & Dev MCP server safe to use?
SiteCheck Agent Intel & Dev scores 66 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the SiteCheck Agent Intel & Dev MCP server expose?
SiteCheck Agent Intel & Dev exposes 135 tools: agent_intel_deep_research, agent_intel_web_search_turbo, agent_intel_news_radar, agent_intel_social_signal_aggregator, agent_intel_reader_markdown_extract, and 130 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 21,286 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the SiteCheck Agent Intel & Dev MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to SiteCheck Agent Intel & Dev without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the SiteCheck Agent Intel & Dev MCP server still maintained?
SiteCheck Agent Intel & Dev is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 24 October 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.